Employment Agreement Template
The employment agreement governs the highest-value, most-regulated relationship most companies have. This template handles at-will and for-cause framing, FLSA exempt classification, Proprietary Information and Invention Assignment (PIIA) language that survives California Labor Code §2870 scrutiny, the post-2024 state-by-state restrictive-covenant landscape, and Section 409A-safe equity and bonus terms.
Draft an Agreement in WordDownload Free Template
Professional Employment Agreement Template (.docx) with LexDraft branding
What an employment agreement actually does
An employment agreement is the single instrument that converts a hire into an enforceable allocation of (i) compensation, (ii) intellectual property, (iii) confidentiality and post-employment restraints, and (iv) termination economics. Outside Montana, the U.S. default is at-will employment — meaning the absence of a written agreement does not create a "non-contract" relationship; it creates a relationship where the employer has weak IP claims, no documented bonus terms, and is exposed to implied-contract claims from offer letters, handbooks, and Slack messages. A clean agreement closes those gaps and pre-empts the most common litigation triggers (wage misclassification, IP ownership disputes, equity vesting confusion, post-termination competition).
The four expensive mistakes
(1) Failing to deliver a state-mandated wage notice (NY Labor Law §195.1, CA Labor Code §2810.5) at hire — six-figure aggregate penalties on a moderate workforce. (2) Misclassifying a non-exempt role as exempt under the FLSA — triple damages plus attorneys' fees in most states. (3) Using a 50-state non-compete in California, Minnesota, or Oklahoma — voids the entire restrictive-covenant package and may expose the employer to attorneys' fees. (4) Omitting the Cal. Labor Code §2870 prior-invention exclusion — voids the entire invention assignment.
When to use a written agreement versus an offer letter
- Executives and key technical hires: Full agreement with severance schedule, equity terms by reference, change-of-control double-trigger acceleration, and 280G gross-up analysis. Always written.
- At-will rank-and-file employees: Offer letter plus standalone PIIA, arbitration agreement, and EEOC-compliant handbook acknowledgment. A short-form letter avoids implied-contract overhang.
- Sales roles with commission: Written agreement is mandatory in California (Lab. Code §2751) and prudent everywhere. The commission plan must specify earning event, payment timing, and post-termination commission entitlement.
- Remote employees crossing state lines: Identify the work location for tax, workers' comp, and choice-of-law purposes. Include a "remote work true-up" allowing reclassification if the employee relocates.
- International hires: A U.S. employment agreement does not satisfy local statutory requirements (e.g., German Werkvertrag rules, UK ACAS Code, French Code du Travail). Use a local-counsel-drafted contract under the laws of the work location.
- Independent contractors who are really employees: Use the independent-contractor template — but only after applying the ABC test (CA AB 5, MA G.L. c. 149 §148B), the IRS 20-factor analysis, and the DOL economic-realities test. Misclassification is now the single largest source of state-AG enforcement actions.
Clauses that decide enforceability
At-will status with for-cause carve-outs
At-will is the default in 49 states (Montana excepted). The clause must be conspicuous, contain an integration clause defeating implied-contract claims from handbooks, and identify the only individuals authorized to modify the at-will relationship.
"Employee's employment is at-will and may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without cause and with or without notice. No employee or representative of the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer has authority to alter the at-will nature of the employment relationship, and any such modification must be in a writing signed by the CEO."
Pitfall: Inconsistent language in the offer letter or handbook (e.g., promising "termination only for good cause" in a progressive-discipline policy) creates an implied contract that overrides the at-will clause. Audit the package, not just the agreement.
Compensation, overtime, and Section 409A
Base salary plus payroll-period; bonus and commission plans by reference (so amendments don't require contract amendment); explicit FLSA classification with a salary that exceeds the applicable state and federal threshold; and a Section 409A compliance recital for any deferred compensation.
"Employee shall be paid an annual base salary of $[●], payable in accordance with Company's standard payroll practices, less applicable withholdings. Employee is classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act and applicable state law. Any payments under this Agreement that constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code are intended to comply with the short-term deferral exception or otherwise be exempt; if not exempt, they shall be paid in compliance with §409A and the regulations thereunder."
Pitfall: A §409A violation imposes a 20% federal excise tax on the employee and is fully employee-borne — but creates massive 280G gross-up and indemnity exposure in M&A diligence. Never describe severance as paid "upon mutual agreement of timing."
Equity by reference, not by recital
Identify the equity plan and grant by reference; do not restate vesting in the employment agreement. This allows changes to vesting (acceleration, repricing, repurchase) without amending the employment agreement.
"Employee shall be granted [number] shares of Company restricted stock / options to purchase [number] shares under and subject to the Company's [Year] Equity Incentive Plan and a separate Grant Notice and Award Agreement, which together constitute the entire agreement regarding the equity grant. In the event of conflict, the Equity Plan and Grant Notice control."
Pitfall: Restating "4-year vest with 1-year cliff" in the employment agreement creates an enforceable contract right that survives later amendments to the equity plan. Use the by-reference approach.
Proprietary Information and Invention Assignment
Assigns all work-related IP to the company, with statutorily mandated exclusions for non-work inventions and a list of prior inventions excluded from assignment. Required for the company to own employee-generated IP.
"Employee hereby assigns and agrees to assign to the Company all right, title, and interest in any invention, work of authorship, or improvement (collectively, 'Inventions') conceived, developed, or reduced to practice by Employee, alone or with others, during the period of employment, that (i) relate to the Company's business or actual or demonstrably anticipated research or development, or (ii) result from work performed for the Company or use of Company resources, except as expressly excluded by California Labor Code §2870 and similar statutes in DE, IL, KS, MN, NC, UT, and WA."
Pitfall: The §2870 notice must be physically delivered with the agreement (CA Lab. Code §2872). A bare assignment without the notice is partially or wholly void for California employees, and the burden is on the employer to prove notice was given.
Restrictive covenants (state-specific)
Confidentiality, non-solicit of customers, non-solicit of employees, and (where lawful) non-competition. Must be drafted to the most restrictive state in which any employee works.
"For twelve (12) months after termination, Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit any customer of the Company with whom Employee had material contact during the last 24 months of employment, for the purpose of selling products or services competitive with those Employee was involved in providing. This restriction does not apply to general advertising not targeted at Company customers, and is void with respect to employees primarily working in California, North Dakota, Oklahoma, or Minnesota."
Pitfall: Garden-leave non-competes (MA G.L. c. 149 §24L: 50% of salary during the restricted period, $75,000+ earnings) require contemporaneous payment and a 10-business-day pre-hire notice. Skip either and the non-compete is void.
Termination, severance, and release
Defines termination triggers (with-cause, without-cause, for good reason), notice periods, severance schedule, and the requirement of a separation release (with statutory revocation periods for age-discrimination waivers under OWBPA).
"If the Company terminates Employee without Cause or Employee resigns for Good Reason, and Employee executes (and does not revoke) a general release of claims in the form attached as Exhibit A within sixty (60) days of termination, the Company shall pay Employee [number] months of base salary continuation and continue group-health premium contributions until the earlier of [number] months or coverage under a new plan."
Pitfall: The release must comply with OWBPA (21 days to consider, 7 days to revoke for age claims; 45 days for group terminations) and cannot release future claims, unwaivable wage claims (CA), or NLRA-protected concerted activity. A defective release returns the entire consideration.
Arbitration with statutory carve-outs
Mandatory arbitration of most employment disputes via JAMS or AAA, with explicit carve-outs for sexual harassment (Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, 2022), statutory whistleblower claims, and injunctive relief.
"Any dispute arising out of or related to Employee's employment shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration administered by JAMS under its Employment Arbitration Rules in the state of Employee's primary work location, except that (i) claims of sexual harassment or sexual assault may be brought in court at Employee's election under 9 U.S.C. §402, (ii) claims for injunctive relief to enforce confidentiality or restrictive covenants may be brought in court, and (iii) representative PAGA claims under California law are not subject to this Agreement."
Pitfall: Class-action waivers are enforceable post-Epic Systems and Viking River, but a clause requiring the employee to bear arbitration fees is unenforceable in most states. The employer must pay arbitrator fees.
Confidentiality with DTSA notice and §1001 carve-out
Confidentiality obligations during and after employment, with the federal DTSA whistleblower notice (18 U.S.C. §1833(b)(3)) and the SEC §21F / CFTC §165.19 anti-gag carve-outs.
"Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, Employee is not prohibited from (i) reporting possible violations of federal law or regulation to any government agency, including making disclosures protected under the whistleblower provisions of federal law; or (ii) disclosing trade secrets in confidence to a federal, state, or local government official or attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law, or in a sealed court filing, as provided in 18 U.S.C. §1833(b)."
Pitfall: SEC Staff Bulletin No. 14L (2021) and CCC v. Boeing settlement set the modern compliance baseline — confidentiality clauses without these carve-outs trigger SEC enforcement (Brink's Co. $400K settlement, 2023).
Choice of law and governing forum
Pick a state with predictable employment law and a venue you can actually litigate in. California, New York, and Massachusetts courts will apply their own public-policy doctrines and override Delaware/New York choice-of-law for employees who work in-state.
"This Agreement is governed by the laws of [State], without regard to its conflict-of-laws principles, except that the law of the state of Employee's primary work location shall govern (i) wage-and-hour matters, (ii) any restrictive covenant, and (iii) any leave entitlement. Each party submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in [County, State] for any matter not subject to arbitration."
Pitfall: A Delaware choice-of-law and a California-resident employee = California law applies to restrictive covenants under Application Group v. Hunter Group and the 2017 amendments to Cal. Lab. Code §925. Don't pretend.
Jurisdiction notes
Employment law is a patchwork of federal floor and state ceiling. The following states meaningfully change drafting decisions:
- California (Bus. & Prof. Code §16600; Lab. Code §§925, 2751, 2810.5, 2870, 2872): Post-employment non-competes are void (with extremely narrow trade-sale and partnership exceptions). 2024 amendments (§16600.1, AB 1076) require employers to notify former employees by Feb. 14, 2024 that their non-competes are void. Wage notice at hire is mandatory. Commission agreements must be in writing. PIIA requires the §2870 notice. Out-of-state choice-of-law clauses are voided for California employees under §925.
- Massachusetts (G.L. c. 149 §24L; Wage Act): Non-competes require: (i) garden-leave equal to 50% of salary or "mutually agreed-upon consideration," (ii) $75,000+ in annualized earnings, (iii) 10-business-day pre-hire notice, (iv) right to consult counsel, (v) maximum 12-month duration. Non-compliant non-competes are void in their entirety. The Wage Act imposes mandatory treble damages and attorneys' fees for late wages with a one-year limitations period.
- New York (GOL §5-336; Lab. Law §§195, 198): Wage Theft Prevention Act notice required at hire and on any change. Sexual-harassment settlement NDA restrictions (S5947, 2019; amended 2023). 2023 amendments to §740 expand whistleblower protection. Albany's proposed non-compete ban (S3100A/A1278) has not yet passed but governs gubernatorial enforcement priorities.
- Minnesota, Oklahoma, North Dakota: Statutory non-compete bans nearly as broad as California. Minnesota's ban took effect July 1, 2023 (Minn. Stat. §181.988) — applies prospectively to agreements entered on or after that date.
- Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, NH, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, Washington: Income-threshold non-compete restrictions (typically $75k–$120k). Colorado (HB 22-1317) requires advance notice and voids non-competes for workers below the threshold; even for above-threshold workers, the non-compete must be narrowly tailored.
- Texas (Bus. & Com. Code §15.50): Non-competes enforceable if ancillary to an otherwise enforceable agreement and reasonable as to scope, time, and geography. Texas readily issues TROs in trade-secret cases under TUTSA.
- European Union and UK: A U.S. employment agreement is not enforceable as the operative employment contract — local law (German Werkvertrag rules, UK Employment Rights Act, French Code du Travail) governs. Use a local Statement of Particulars (UK, by day one of employment) or local-counsel-drafted contract.
How to draft your employment agreement in LexDraft
Classify the role correctly first
Open LexDraft in Word. Pick the state(s) of the employee's primary work location, FLSA exempt vs. non-exempt status (with the correct salary threshold), and the at-will or for-cause framework. LexDraft surfaces state-specific notice requirements and salary thresholds automatically.
Layer compensation and IP
Add base salary, bonus and commission plan by reference, equity grant by reference, and the PIIA with the §2870 notice. Section 409A recital is auto-inserted for any severance or deferred-comp payment.
Apply state-specific restrictive covenants
LexDraft applies the correct restrictive-covenant regime for the work location (California void, Massachusetts garden-leave, Colorado threshold, etc.). Arbitration clause with statutory carve-outs is auto-included. Download the .docx, attach the wage notice and arbitration acknowledgment, and execute.
Best practices a senior employment partner would actually use
Don't draft a 50-state non-compete
A pan-jurisdictional non-compete is the legal equivalent of a "FOR DECORATIVE USE ONLY" sticker. Build a state-specific table at the start of the restrictive-covenant section. California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma get the non-solicit only. Massachusetts and Colorado get garden-leave and threshold language. Everywhere else, scope, duration, and geography are calibrated to the role.
Build the §2870 notice into the signature page
The notice must be physically delivered with the agreement. Putting it as the last paragraph above the signature block creates an evidentiary record that survives litigation. Cal. Lab. Code §2872 burdens the employer to prove delivery — solve the problem by design, not by HR practice.
Use separate PIIA, arbitration, and at-will acknowledgment for rank-and-file
An offer letter plus three short-form acknowledgments is cleaner than one long employment agreement for non-executive hires. Each acknowledgment can be amended independently; the employment relationship remains at-will and unmodified.
Add the EFAA, SEC §21F, and DTSA carve-outs to every confidentiality clause
These three carve-outs are the modern compliance floor: (i) federal Ending Forced Arbitration Act (sexual harassment), (ii) SEC anti-gag rule (Staff Bulletin 14L), (iii) DTSA whistleblower notice (§1833(b)). Their absence triggers SEC enforcement and federal preemption. There is no good reason to omit them.
Make severance contingent on a clean release
Severance should be paid only after an effective, irrevocable release. For employees over 40, the OWBPA requires 21 days to consider (45 for group reductions) and 7 days to revoke. Pay the first severance installment on day 8 — not before. Failing this triggers a defective release, which courts have repeatedly held returns the consideration and revives the underlying claims.
Audit the offer-letter/handbook stack for implied-contract terms
An at-will clause is overridden by a handbook that uses "permanent employees" or promises "termination only for cause." Run the entire pre-hire package through a single integration clause that disclaims implied terms outside the four corners of the employment agreement.
Use double-trigger acceleration on executive equity
Single-trigger acceleration (vesting on change-of-control alone) inflates §280G parachute payments and depresses acquisition value. Double-trigger (change-of-control plus involuntary termination within 12–18 months) is market and cleaner for §280G analysis. Pair with a 280G best-net cutback so the executive captures the larger of pre-cut or post-cut net proceeds.
Pre-empt sales-commission disputes
For sales roles, the commission plan must specify the earning event (booking, invoice, cash receipt), the right to claw back on customer non-payment, and post-termination commission entitlement (the "split-the-baby" trailing commissions). Cal. Lab. Code §2751 requires the plan to be in writing; New York applies the constructive-receipt doctrine to commissions earned but unpaid at termination.
Frequently Asked Questions About Employment Agreements
Outside Montana (the only true non-at-will state by default), no U.S. jurisdiction requires a written employment agreement. But the absence of one creates three documented liabilities: (i) IP created by the employee may not vest in the employer without a written PIIA, leaving open whether the work product is a "work made for hire" under 17 U.S.C. §101; (ii) the employee can claim implied-contract terms from offer letters, emails, and handbook language; and (iii) state wage-statement and earned-wage-notice laws (NY Labor Law §195; CA Lab. Code §2810.5) impose statutory penalties for missing written notices. The cost of drafting is trivial compared to defending an IP ownership dispute mid-acquisition.
Highly state-dependent and trending more restrictive. California (Bus. & Prof. Code §16600 with §16600.1 expansion in 2024), North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Minnesota (§181.988, effective July 2023) void post-employment non-competes entirely. Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington enforce only against high earners ($75k–$120k thresholds). Massachusetts (G.L. c. 149 §24L) requires garden leave of 50% of salary, $75,000+ earnings, 10-business-day pre-hire notice, and a 12-month cap. The FTC's nationwide non-compete ban (final 2024) was vacated in Ryan LLC v. FTC (N.D. Tex. 2024), but state legislatures have continued tightening. Non-solicits and confidentiality agreements remain broadly enforceable.
Exempt employees are salaried and not entitled to overtime; non-exempt employees must receive 1.5x base for hours over 40 per week. The 2024 DOL final rule raised the salary threshold to $43,888 (July 2024) and would have raised it to $58,656 (Jan 2025), but it was vacated nationwide by State of Texas v. DOL (Nov. 2024). The 2019 threshold of $35,568 currently applies federally. State thresholds are often higher: California $66,560 (2024); Washington and Colorado have separate higher thresholds. Misclassification triggers triple damages and attorneys' fees in many states, and is increasingly the trigger for state-AG enforcement actions. The contract should specify the classification — but the actual classification is determined by duties and salary, not by what the contract says.
Yes for most commercial disputes, but with statutory carve-outs. The Federal Arbitration Act preempts most state limitations after Epic Systems v. Lewis (2018) and Viking River Cruises v. Moriana (2022, on PAGA representative claims). However, the federal Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (9 U.S.C. §401, March 2022) voids any pre-dispute arbitration agreement covering sexual harassment or assault claims at the claimant's election. California (AB 51, partially preempted but live) and New York have additional restrictions. Use a JAMS or AAA employment-rules clause with carve-outs for (i) sexual harassment, (ii) statutory whistleblower claims, (iii) injunctive relief to enforce confidentiality, and (iv) PAGA representative actions in California. The employer must pay arbitrator fees — fee-shifting to the employee is unenforceable.
Public companies must comply with SEC Rule 10D-1 and the NYSE / Nasdaq listing rules (NYSE §303A.14, Nasdaq Rule 5608) — a three-year clawback of incentive compensation received by current and former executive officers following an accounting restatement. Private companies should still include voluntary clawback for fraud, gross misconduct, or financial restatement, and tie equity vesting to a separate equity plan and grant notice (not the employment agreement) so amendments don't require contract amendment. Include a Section 409A compliance recital on any severance, deferred-comp, or bonus payment that could be considered nonqualified deferred compensation — a §409A violation imposes a 20% federal excise tax on the employee plus interest, fully employee-borne.
Yes if the employee will work in California — and ideally everywhere, because the broader version of the notice also covers Delaware, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington, which have substantially similar statutes. California Labor Code §2870 voids any invention assignment that purports to assign inventions developed entirely on the employee's own time, without use of company resources, and unrelated to the employer's business. §2872 requires written notice of these rights at the time of contract — and the burden is on the employer to prove notice was given. Without the notice, the entire invention assignment may be void as to that employee, exposing the company to a quiet-title fight over the underlying IP.
Yes — and you should. Severance is consideration for the release; without consideration, the release fails. For employees over 40, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (29 U.S.C. §626(f)) requires (i) 21 days to consider (45 for group reductions), (ii) 7 days to revoke after signing, (iii) advice to consult counsel, and (iv) reference to ADEA rights specifically. Pay the first severance installment on day 8 after the revocation window closes — paying earlier triggers a defective release and the employee may keep both the severance and the underlying claim. Releases cannot waive unwaivable wage claims (California), workers' comp claims, NLRA-protected concerted activity, or future claims.
Draft state-aware employment contracts in Word
LexDraft applies the correct FLSA threshold, restrictive-covenant regime, and PIIA notice for the employee's work location automatically — so you don't ship a 50-state non-compete to a California engineer.
Install LexDraft for Word