<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:video="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-video/1.1">
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/check-an-nda-clause-for-risk-free-clause-risk-checker</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aaPR2uhBDGg/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>Check an NDA Clause for Risk: Free Clause Risk Checker</video:title>
      <video:description>Paste a contract clause into the free LexDraft Clause Risk Checker, set the governing law, your side of the deal and the contract type, and get a risk rating, a plain summary and each issue with the reason it matters. Shown on a fictional NDA confidentiality clause. Use it as a first pass, then review the clause yourself. Not legal advice.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/aaPR2uhBDGg</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>35</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T20:00:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/indemnify-defend-and-hold-harmless-in-plain-english-free-translator</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c-uealT1SY/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>Indemnify, Defend and Hold Harmless in Plain English (Free Translator)</video:title>
      <video:description>Paste a clause into the free LexDraft Legal Jargon Translator and get it rewritten in plain English, with each legal term explained and points to watch out for. Shown on a fictional software licence indemnity clause: indemnify, defend and hold harmless, with a carve-out for gross negligence and wilful misconduct. Use it to understand the clause, then review it yourself. Not legal advice.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/5c-uealT1SY</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>37</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T18:00:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/dpa-review-undefined-terms-found</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENf_jth64dg/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>DPA review: undefined terms, found</video:title>
      <video:description>Closing QA in Word on a fictional data processing agreement: a capitalised term never defined, a list that skips an item, and a party name in lower case.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/ENf_jth64dg</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>21</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T15:00:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/are-non-competes-enforceable-in-california-free-checker</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NvKi9gvxFdw/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>Are Non-Competes Enforceable in California? Free Checker</video:title>
      <video:description>Enter a state and the terms of a non-compete (duration, distance, industry and whether the employee received something in return) in the free LexDraft Non-Compete Checker. This fictional California example comes back as not enforceable for an employee non-compete under Business and Professions Code section 16600, with the limited exceptions such as the sale of a business. General information only, not legal advice; have a lawyer review the actual agreement.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/NvKi9gvxFdw</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>44</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T02:44:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/one-term-two-definitions</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SCST5oRcC3M/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>One term, two definitions?</video:title>
      <video:description>LexDraft in Word on a fictional supply agreement: a term defined twice, a party name nobody defined and a list letter used twice.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/SCST5oRcC3M</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>30</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T02:41:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/does-section-14-2-even-exist</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qLCaqjTE4Ss/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>Does Section 14.2 even exist?</video:title>
      <video:description>Check cross-references and Closing QA in Word on a fictional services agreement: a reference with no target, a party name that does not match, and a duplicate clause number.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/qLCaqjTE4Ss</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>32</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T02:38:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/clause-17-went-missing-in-the-redline</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/2Qn8yJ8keMg/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>Clause 17 went missing in the redline?</video:title>
      <video:description>Closing QA in Word on a fictional 11-page services agreement: numbering jumps from 16 to 18, a reference to a missing section and a term never defined.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/2Qn8yJ8keMg</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>28</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T02:34:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
  <url>
    <loc>https://lexdraft.ai/videos/nda-review-catch-the-drafting-slips</loc>
    <video:video>
      <video:thumbnail_loc>https://i.ytimg.com/vi/BPnnlFNZAS0/hqdefault.jpg</video:thumbnail_loc>
      <video:title>NDA review: catch the drafting slips</video:title>
      <video:description>LexDraft quick checks in Word on a fictional NDA: a defined term in lower case, an undefined party name and a reference to a clause that does not exist. Rule-based, no AI.</video:description>
      <video:player_loc>https://www.youtube.com/embed/BPnnlFNZAS0</video:player_loc>
      <video:duration>23</video:duration>
      <video:publication_date>2026-10-20T02:29:00+00:00</video:publication_date>
      <video:family_friendly>yes</video:family_friendly>
    </video:video>
  </url>
</urlset>
